Skip to main content
· 10/5/1891

Worley v. Nethercott

Citations

  • 91 Cal. 512
  • 27 P. 767
  • 1891 Cal. LEXIS 1120

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that counsel's failure to pursue a futile objection does not amount to ineffective assistance
  • “Whether a person was a party to a crime can be inferred from his presence, companionship, and conduct before and after the crime was committed.”
  • “Whether a person was a party to a crime can be inferred from his presence, companionship, and conduct before and after the crime was committed.”
  • “ ‘Whether a person was a party to a crime can be inferred from his presence, companionship, and conduct before and after the crime was committed.’ ” (citation omitted)
  • “[A] new trial will not be granted unless it is clear that the trial court’s curative instruction failed to eliminate the effect of the prejudicial comment.”
  • “‘Whether a person was a party to a crime can be inferred from his presence, companionship, and conduct before and after the crime was committed.’” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Belcher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.