Worley v. Moore

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• instructing that the correct legal standard in assessing conflicts of interest under North Carolina State Bar Revised Professional Conduct Rule 1.9(a
• reversing and remanding for an application of the proper legal standard where the trial court applied an incorrect test
• examining the Restatement (Third) of The Law Governing Lawyers when interpreting and applying RPC 1.9(a)
• reversing and remanding for an application of the proper legal standard where the trial court applied an incorrect test
• court considers “what would ‘normally’ have occurred within the scope of [the] representation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Krispy Kreme Doughnuts, Inc. S'holder Litig.
  North Carolina Business Court· 2018-06-20· cited 1×
• State v. Perry
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2018-10-16
• Chambers v. Moses H. Cone Mem'l Hosp.
  Supreme Court of North Carolina· 2020-06-05
• Mauck v. Cherry Oil Co., Inc.
  North Carolina Business Court· 2021-09-20

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.
  Supreme Court· 1990-06-11· cited 4,510×
• Nix v. Whiteside
  Supreme Court· 1986-02-26· cited 983×
• The Government of India and the Food Corporation of India v. Cook Industries, Inc. And Cook and Company
  Second Circuit· 1978-01-13· cited 280×
• Silver Chrysler Plymouth, Inc. v. Chrysler Motors Corporation and Chrysler Realty Corporation
  Second Circuit· 1975-05-23· cited 225×
• Allegaert v. Perot
  Second Circuit· 1977-11-07· cited 36×
• Plant Genetic Systems, N v. v. Ciba Seeds
  M.D. North Carolina· 1996-05-24· cited 31×
• In re Estate of Skinner
  Supreme Court of North Carolina· 2017-09-29· cited 22×