Skip to main content
· 3/31/2004

Worley v. Barger

Citations

  • 807 N.E.2d 1222
  • 347 Ill. App. 3d 492
  • 283 Ill. Dec. 381
  • 2004 Ill. App. LEXIS 423

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a section 2 — 615 motion challenges the legal sufficiency of the complaint on its face
  • noting that a section 2-615 motion challenges the legal sufficiency of the complaint on its face
  • noting that a section 2-615 motion challenges the legal sufficiency of the complaint on its face
  • choosing to analyze the defendant's section 2-619 motion to dismiss as if it had been filed pursuant to section 2-615 because the defendant's motion attacked the legal sufficiency of the complaint
  • choosing to analyze the defendant’s section 2 — 619 motion to dismiss as if it had been filed pursuant to section 2 — 615 because the defendant’s motion attacked the legal sufficiency of the complaint
  • choosing to analyze the defendant's section 2-619 motion to dismiss as if it had been filed pursuant to section 2-615 because the defendant's motion attacked the legal sufficiency of the complaint

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chapman, Donovan, Kuehn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.