World Wide Supply OU v. Quail Cruises Ship Management

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that quasi in rem jurisdiction involves an action “against a party who is not personally present in the district but whose property is present”
• stating that “the fact that the property had left the district did not moot the appeal because the district court would again have personal jurisdiction over [the defendant] if the attachment were reinstated”
• “Rule B . . . requires, as a precondition to its application, that the defendant not be present in the district . . . .”
• “. . .in a maritime in rem action, where the action is directly against the res, the departure of the res from the district does not necessarily moot the case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).