World Carpets, Inc. v. Dick Littrell's New World Carpets, Joseph E. Russell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding strong evidence of likelihood of confusion in survey showing a 15 percent association rate between Texon sign and exxon
• \There can be no more positive or substantial proof of the likelihood of confusion than proof of actual confusion.\
• “[R]eason tells us that ... very little proof of actual confusion would be necessary to prove the likelihood of confusion.”
• “There can be no more positive or substantial proof of the likelihood of confusion than proof of actual confusion.... [Vjery little proof of actual confusion would be necessary to prove the likelihood of cdnfusion.”
• a single anecdote is insufficient

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).