Workman v. Oregon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that child’s statement was admissible under excited utterance exception even though statement was not made immediately after incident and was the product of questioning
• no unnecessary delay under Futch, supra, where two hours of administrative processing were caused in part by defendant’s misleading police as to his identity
• no unnecessary delay under Futch, supra, where two hours of administrative processing were caused in part by defendant's misleading police as to his identity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).