Workman v. Insurance Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiffs must allege some fact or facts demonstrating that outside pressure actually influenced the university, not just to aggressively pursue sexual assault cases, but to do so in a manner biased against males
• complaints from student body, media reporting, and a government investigation, in part, alleged pro-victim bias, but were not sufficient to allege gender bias
• articulable doubt cast by arguing that university police filed criminal complaints absent probable cause, arrested the plaintiffs, and submitted a flawed report to the district attorney

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).