Skip to main content
· 10/29/1894

Workman v. Dodd

Citations

  • 55 Ill. App. 597
  • 1894 Ill. App. LEXIS 486

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \The hearing examiner has discretion to determine how much weight to ascribe to each factor under consideration\
  • \Doe is not entitled to a guarantee that SORB will reach the same conclusion as his expert; he is entitled only to careful consideration of his expert's testimony\
  • plaintiff's offenses committed against strangers in public locations warranted 8 Internet publication so that members of public could \take precautions to avoid encountering [plaintiff] in situations in which the members of the public are vulnerable\
  • hearing examiner must explain reasoning for rejecting expert testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boggs

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.