Skip to main content
· 12/20/1982

Workman Family Partnership v. City of Twin Falls

Citations

  • 655 P.2d 926
  • 104 Idaho 32
  • 1982 Ida. LEXIS 316

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that failure to hold otherwise would be to authorize the district court to substitute its judgment for that of the agency despite the express provision prohibiting such action in subsection (g) of I.C. § 67-5215
  • stating that failure to hold otherwise would be to authorize the district court to substitute its judgment for that of the agency despite the express provision prohibiting such action in subsection (g) of I.C. § 67-5215
  • zoning case under Administrative Procedure Act, wherein the Court noted that the informal letter offered as findings for review was nowhere shown to have been authorized by the agency
  • zoning case under Administrative Procedure Act, wherein the Court noted that the informal letter offered as findings for review was nowhere shown to have been authorized by the agency
  • zoning commission must make record of proceedings; otherwise, judicial review is ineffectual

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bistline, Bakes, McFadden, Donaldson, Shepard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.