Skip to main content
· 5/21/1923

Work v. United States Ex Rel. McAlester-Edwards Co.

Citations

  • 262 U.S. 200
  • 43 S. Ct. 580
  • 67 L. Ed. 949
  • 1923 U.S. LEXIS 2633

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that where statute referred to “the appraisement,” “the use of the definite article means an appraisement specifically provided for.”
  • Congress’s “use of the definite article [in a reference to “the appraisement”] means an appraisement specifically provided for”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Taft

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.