Skip to main content

Word v. State

Citations

  • 261 N.E.2d 225
  • 254 Ind. 542
  • 1970 Ind. LEXIS 579

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying the common law \breaking and entering\ element, which connotes a more forceful means of intrusion than Utah's \unlawfully enter\ element, and holding that opening an unlocked door may be sufficient to demonstrate burglary
  • applying the common law \breaking and entering\' element, which connotes a more forceful means of intrusion than Viah's \unlawfully enter\ element, and holding that opening an unlocked door may be sufficient to demonstrate burglary
  • sufficient evidence to establish a breaking where a screwdriver was used to gain entry to a car leaving pry marks on the door, even though no eyewitness conclusively identified the object, proved the pry marks were made when Word entered, or proved the screwdriver belonged to him

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: DeBruler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.