Worcester & Nashua Railroad v. Hinds

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “even when the exact amount of damages is not ascertainable until issues of fact have been decided by the jury, prejudgment interest is proper”
• issue preclusion did not apply where the issues, “although similar, were not ‘identical’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).