Wooten v. Principi

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[i]n McKinney v. Boyle, 11 404 F.2d 632 (9th Cir. 1968), we held that although a movant cited only to subsection (3) 12 of Rule 60(b), the district court erred when it failed to address subsection (6

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).