Skip to main content
Fourth Circuit· 7/21/1981

Wooten v. Clifton Forge School Board

Citations

  • 655 F.2d 552

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying Roth and Sindermann, court concluded that plaintiff had not shown property interest in employment under either his contract or state law
  • property interest in continued employment did not include right not to be reassigned

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Butzner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.