Fourth Circuit· 7/21/1981
Wooten v. Clifton Forge School Board
Citations
- 655 F.2d 552
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying Roth and Sindermann, court concluded that plaintiff had not shown property interest in employment under either his contract or state law
- property interest in continued employment did not include right not to be reassigned
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Butzner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.