Wooten v. Clifton Forge School Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying Roth and Sindermann, court concluded that plaintiff had not shown property interest in employment under either his contract or state law
• property interest in continued employment did not include right not to be reassigned

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Baruah v. Young
  D. Maryland· 1982-03-24· cited 19×
• Royster v. Board of Trustees of Anderson County School District No. Five
  Fourth Circuit· 1985-10-03· cited 12×
• David M. Ogilbee v. Western District Guidance Center, Inc., a Non-Profit Corporation, and J. F. Brammer
  Fourth Circuit· 1981-09-02· cited 10×
• Buchanan v. Little Rock School District
  Eighth Circuit· 1996-07-15· cited 8×
• Wilkinson v. School Bd. of County of Henrico
  E.D. Virginia· 1983-06-28· cited 5×
• Unnamed case
  Fourth Circuit· 1985-10-03· cited 2×
• Buchanan v. Little Rock School District
  Eighth Circuit· 1996-05-28· cited 1×
• Unnamed case
  Fourth Circuit· 1981-07-21
• Geyer v. Millner
  W.D. Virginia· 1987-09-09

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth
  Supreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 14,284×
• Perry v. Sindermann
  Supreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 5,238×
• Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
  Supreme Court· 1978-01-23· cited 3,039×
• Bishop v. Wood
  Supreme Court· 1976-06-10· cited 2,973×