District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 5/29/1997
Wooley v. United States
Citations
- 697 A.2d 777
- 1997 D.C. App. LEXIS 121
- 1997 WL 343992
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Heroin and cocaine are controlled substances which the legislature has identified by different ‘schedules,’ tests, and characterizations of abuse”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ferren, Steadman, Farrell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Michael D. Tann v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2015-11-19· cited 36×
- Maddox v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2000-02-03· cited 34×
- Tyler v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1997-09-23· cited 22×
- O'Brien v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2008-12-23· cited 21×
- Pace v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1998-01-15· cited 18×
- Robinson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1997-05-29· cited 18×
- Zacarias v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2005-10-06· cited 17×
- Carter v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2003-06-05· cited 13×
- Digsby v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2009-10-01· cited 9×
- Ramirez v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2012-08-16· cited 9×
- Young v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2000-02-17· cited 8×
- Lee v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2011-05-26· cited 5×
- Savoy v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2009-10-01· cited 1×
- Com. of PA v. W. & N. ClementiCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2020-07-06
- Pritchett v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2026-02-05
Cites
29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1931-12-11· cited 10,676×
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court· 1991-05-20· cited 6,060×
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1935-04-15· cited 4,581×
- Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1960-01-11· cited 2,073×
- Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1962-05-21· cited 1,715×
- M. A. P. v. RyanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1971-12-29· cited 973×
- Ex Parte BainSupreme Court· 1887-03-28· cited 814×
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court· 1985-04-01· cited 752×
- United States v. Marion Knuckles, Rose Smith and Raymond BrownSecond Circuit· 1978-06-30· cited 153×
- Mosley v. United States Department of LaborSupreme Court· 1978-11-27· cited 109×
- Frederick Jackson v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1966-05-12· cited 75×
- Ingram v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-06-21· cited 58×
- Holiday v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1996-07-30· cited 46×
- Scutchings v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1986-05-27· cited 39×
- Lucky Stores, Inc. v. HolihanSupreme Court· 1997-03-31· cited 34×
- Woodall v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1996-10-24· cited 22×
- Giles v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1984-02-21· cited 22×
- Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1992-08-18· cited 22×
- Meredith v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1975-08-07· cited 18×
- Robinson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1997-05-29· cited 18×
Other cases named Wooley v. United States
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.