Wooldridge v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• trial court properly refused to instruct the jury on the defense of insanity where there was no evidence tending to rebut the presumption of sanity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hooks v. Workman
  Tenth Circuit· 2012-08-03· cited 270×
• Trice v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1993-04-15· cited 103×
• Patton v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1998-12-09· cited 96×
• Sallahdin v. Gibson
  Tenth Circuit· 2002-01-04· cited 80×
• Tate v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1995-05-10· cited 41×
• State v. Gardner
  Utah Supreme Court· 1993-12-03· cited 7×
• Gregg Alan Wooldridge v. H.N. Scott Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
  Tenth Circuit· 1996-02-26· cited 3×
• IN RE ADOPTION OF 2016 REVISIONS TO OKLAHOMA UNIFORM JURY INSTRUCTIONS-CRIMINAL
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2016-06-01
• IN RE ADOPTION OF THE 2018 REVISIONS TO THE OKLAHOMA UNIFORM JURY INSTRUCTIONS-CRIMINAL (SECOND EDITION)
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2018-07-27