Skip to main content
· 3/6/1891

Woody v. Bennett

Citations

  • 88 Cal. 241
  • 26 P. 117
  • 1891 Cal. LEXIS 677

Syllabus

<p>Practice — Conflicting Evidence — Presumption.'— In the supreme court, if the evidence is contradictory, that in support of the verdict must be assumed to be true.</p> <p>Contract — Performance—Refusal to Perform—Condition.—If one who is bound to perform a contract annexes an unwarranted condition to his offer of performance, it is, in effect, a refusal to perform.</p> <p>Sale for Certain Purposes — Unfitness for the Purpose —Damages.— If a stallion is sold for breeding purposes, evidence of his unfitness for such purposes is admissible on the question of damages.</p> <p>Id. —Damages. — Evidence of the nature and probable duration of the blemishes has relation to his value, and consequently is admissible on the question of damages.</p> <p>Id. —Damages. —Evidence as to what plaintiff paid for the stallion is admissible on the question of damages.</p>

Judges: Hayne

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.