Woodward v. Dept. of Justice

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \An exclusion that is clear and unambiguous must be given effect.” (quoting Farm & City Ins. Co. v. Gilmore
• \[A]t no point in this litigation until the petition for rehearing did the state argue that we should apply [Mitchell v.] Esparza [540 U.S. 12

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).