Woodward v. Cline

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that state prisoner’s claim that his guilty plea was not knowing and voluntary was not claim of actual innocence necessary to equitably toll limitations period
• holding that state prisoner’s claim that his guilty plea was not knowing and voluntary was not a claim of actual innocence necessary to equitably toll limitations period
• determining that a motion under Kansas statute permitting biological testing is not an application for collateral review that tolls AEDPA’s statute of limitations
• determining that a motion under No. 21-2845 Kares v. Morrison Page 11 Kansas statute permitting biological testing is not an application for collateral review that tolls AEDPA’s statute of limitations
• observing that, “{i]n essence the motion was a request for discovery”
• “The most common date that starts the [AEDPA limitations period] clock is” the date on which the state-court judgment became final

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).