Woodson v. Porter Brown Limestone Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Rule 404(b) is not limited to other crime evidence
• holding that, even when the trial court made no explicit finding, it was proper to conclude that the objecting party had made a prima facie case “[o]therwise, the court would not have required the [striker] to explain the challenge”
• observing that an objection at the time of admission is required “in order to preserve its introduction as error”
• recognizing trial court may decide what remedy to apply depending on circumstances of case
• signaling that reseating juror or striking entire venire alternate appropriate remedies
• noting that extremely persuasive evidence tends to be prejudicial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).