Woodson v. Brown

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Board's finding of no relationship between any in-service injury and a current disability was \not clearly erroneous\
• holding that appellant's section 1728 claim was not well grounded under former 38 U.S.C. § 5107(a)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Marciniak v. Brown
  Veterans Claims· 1997-04-21· cited 37×
• Daniel R. Gilbert v. Eric K. Shinseki
  Veterans Claims· 2012-10-24· cited 11×
• James Woodson, Claimant-Appellant v. Jesse Brown, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
  Federal Circuit· 1996-06-28· cited 9×
• Bellezza v. Principi
  Veterans Claims· 2002-06-04· cited 3×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Murphy v. Derwinski
  Veterans Claims· 1990-11-08· cited 305×
• Grottveit v. Brown
  Veterans Claims· 1993-05-05· cited 193×
• Heuer v. Brown
  Veterans Claims· 1995-02-07· cited 71×
• King v. Brown
  Veterans Claims· 1993-04-20· cited 63×
• Parker v. Brown
  Veterans Claims· 1994-10-21· cited 32×
• Mays v. Brown
  Veterans Claims· 1993-07-26· cited 12×