Skip to main content
· 2/28/2003

Woodside Homes of California, Inc. v. Superior Court

Citations

  • 132 Cal. Rptr. 2d 35
  • 107 Cal. App. 4th 723
  • 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2855
  • 2003 Daily Journal DAR 3631
  • 2003 Cal. App. LEXIS 484

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that, regardless of “the fairness or 13 desirability of a secrecy provision with respect to the parties themselves,” there is “nothing 14 unreasonable or prejudicial about it”
  • buyers necessarily made aware of provision’s existence by initialing paragraph 23 separately

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hollenhorst

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.