Woods v. Woods

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• a binding mutual understanding or meeting of the minds sufficient to establish a contract requires no precise formality or express utterance from the parties themselves as to all of the details of the proposed agreement, and a contract may be implied from conduct and circumstances
• \pleading over waived any objection as to verification\
• “pleading over waived any objection as to verification”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• McVaney v. BAIRD, HOLM, McEACHEN
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1991-03-08· cited 92×
• Loren E. Barry v. Maurice Sigler, Warden, Nebraska Penal and Correctional Complex
  Eighth Circuit· 1967-04-13· cited 73×
• Atokad Agricultural & Racing Ass'n v. Governors of Knights of Ak-Sar-Ben
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1991-03-01· cited 37×
• In Re Interest of LD
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1986-12-19· cited 32×
• Overmier v. Parks
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1993-02-19· cited 18×
• Joseph Heiting and Sons v. Jacks Bean Co.
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1990-12-14· cited 14×
• Foreman v. AS Mid-America, Inc.
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1998-09-25· cited 11×
• State ex rel. Keuck v. Gamber
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1983-03-30· cited 1×
• Wheeler v. D.D.
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1986-12-19· cited 1×
• Linscott v. Shasteen
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2014-06-06