Skip to main content

Woods v. Telb

Citations

  • 2000 Ohio 171
  • 89 Ohio St. 3d 504

Syllabus

Criminal procedure—Validity of R.C. 2967.28 examined—R.C. 2967.28 does not violate the separation of powers doctrine or Due Process Clauses of the United States and Ohio Constitutions—Trial court must inform defendant at sentencing or at time of plea hearing that post-release control is part of defendant's sentence—Post-release control terminates at end of applicable period set forth in R.C. 2967.28(B)—Time spent in jail as a sanction for a post-release control violation counts toward the cap in R.C. 2967.28(F)(3).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • describing the legislative intent behind a new, comprehensive sentencing structure, including postrelease control
  • describing the legislative intent behind a new, comprehensive sentencing structure, including postrelease control

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lundberg Stratton, J.

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.