Woods v. State ex rel. Department of Health & Hospitals

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[although the plaintiffs did not specifically label [the unjust enrichment] count as being in the alternative to the first and second counts, it is clear that it is meant to provide an alternative basis for recovery in the event of a failure of proof under those counts”
• “Although the plaintiffs did not specifically label [the unjust enrichment count] as being in the alternative to the [contractual counts], it is clear that it is meant to provide an alternative basis for recovery in the event of a failure of proof under those counts.”
• “[a]lthough the plaintiffs did not specifically label [the unjust enrichment] count as being in the alternative to the first and second counts, it is clear that it is meant to provide an alternative basis for recovery in the event of a failure of proof under those counts”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).