Woods v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “any defect in the Departure Form[,]” which was required to be attached to the judgment and commitment order, “should have first been raised to the trial court for consideration and possible correction”
• holding “that any defect in the Departure Form[,]” which was required by law to be attached to the judgment and commitment form, “should have first been raised to the trial court for consideration and possible correction”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Zachary Vermillion v. State of Arkansas
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2024-06-05· cited 5×
• Lewis v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2008-01-23· cited 2×
• NATHANIEL FORT V. STATE OF ARKANSAS
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2025-10-09

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Spears v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1995-09-11· cited 8×
• Cox v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 1991-12-11· cited 5×
• Holloway v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1992-09-28· cited 5×
• Smith v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1994-10-03· cited 5×