Skip to main content

Woods v. State

Citations

  • 640 N.E.2d 1089
  • 1994 Ind. App. LEXIS 1355
  • 1994 WL 541291

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the defendant had capability to maintain dominion and control over drugs found in the car he was driving and under the car seat where he was sitting
  • explaining that “[c]onstructive possession of items found in a vehicle may be imputed to the driver of the vehicle” and affirming the defendant’s possession of cocaine conviction where he was driving and the drugs were found under his seat
  • explaining that “[c]onstructive possession of items found in a vehicle may be imputed to the driver of the vehicle” and affirming the defendant’s possession of cocaine conviction where he was driving and the drugs were found under his seat
  • evidence was sufficient to prove possession of cocaine when cocaine was found under driver’s seat of vehicle Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 17A-CR-3034 | October 24, 2018 Page 19 of 20 defendant was operating

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sullivan, Barteau

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.