Woods v. Schmitt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating when the facts “were in dispute . . . [t]he motions should have been denied”
• distinguishing the doctrine of fraudulent concealment from the discovery rule, and noting the doctrine of fraudulent concealment was adopted in 1875 whereas the discovery rule was adopted in 1967

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).