Woods v. Resnick

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the defendant could not establish joint authorship of a copyrighted source code where the defendant failed to translate his ideas into a fixed medium, but merely provided ideas for the source code, excel spreadsheets, and mock-ups of reports and screen displays
• “motions to reconsider [interlocutory orders] are judged by largely the same standards as motions to alter or amend a judgment under Rule 59(e)”
• a motion for reconsideration “does not allow a party to . . . advance arguments that could and should have been presented to the district court prior to the judgment”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).