Woods v. Pine Mountain, Ltd. (In Re Pine Mountain, Ltd.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding indubitable equivalent where secured creditor received new promissory notes junior only to a construction loan
• applying subsection (iii) of § 1129(b)(2)(A), not subsection (i), to a lien primed under the terms of the plan
• facts underlying the “indubitable equivalence” determination are reviewed under the clearly erroneous standard; however, the question of whether the legal standard has been satisfied is reviewed independently
• appellant’s failure to include issue in the Rule 8006 statement resulted in waiver of the issue, but the panel went on to decide the issue, “assuming” it was before them

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).