Woods v. Pence

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• evidence of three to five repairs in a five-year period raises at least an inference of a chronic condition that has not been permanently eliminated
• “[The] Act provides that one who knowingly violates the Act, or discloses information on the report known to be false, is liable for actual damages and court costs.”
• whether seller knew of material defect is a question of fact
• whether seller knew of material defect is a question of fact
• whether seller knew of material defect is a question of fact

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).