Woods v. Michigan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying the principle that \a party which relies to its detriment on a [representation] may receive a setoff in damages equal to the amount expended in reliance\
• applying the principle that “a party which relies to its detriment on a [representation] may receive a setoff in damages equal to the amount expended in reliance”
• approving award of replacement cost of damaged academic robes, as the plaintiff secured substitute goods after the accident, lost no sales, and had no opportunity for sales with the damaged goods
• approving award of replacement cost of damaged academic robes, as the plaintiff secured substitute goods after the accident, lost no sales, and had no opportunity for sales with the damaged goods
• “[D]istrict courts may not depart from the normal practice of awarding fees to the prevailing party without first articulating some good reason for doing so.”
• “[D]istrict courts may not depart from the ‘normal practice’ of awarding fees to the prevailing party without first articulating some good reason for doing so.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).