Woods v. Merrill
Citations
- 57 Cal. 435
Syllabus
<p>Practice—Findings—Insufficiency of Evidence—New Trial.—On a motion for a new trial it appeared that the evidence sustained the findings, except that the evidence showed that a certain sum should have been credited to the defendant, and such credit was by some mistake not allowed in the findings; the new trial was denied. Held, on appeal from the order an<[ judgment, that the order should be affirmed, and the judgment modified so as to allow said credit.</p>
Judges: Ross
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.