Woods v. Holliday

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the court did not have personal jurisdiction under Calder where plaintiff alleged that defendants knew she practiced law in Minnesota and included her Minnesota address on the defamatory website at issue
• finding that disparaging comments about an attorney online was insufficient to establish specific jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).