Woods v. Foster

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the receipt of federal funds in return for providing shelter for the homeless was sufficient to establish that defendants “rent[ed]” the shelter
• holding that a stay of up to 120 days was “temporary” but still a “residence” and “not . . . merely transient”
• holding that defendants’ receipt of $125,000 federal HUD grant was “undoubtedly consideration”
• amended complaint \should allege each tort against each defendant in separate count in order to make clear what the specific allegations a r e \
• the homeless are not visitors or those on a temporary sojourn in the sense of motel guests ... it cannot be said that the people who live [in the shelter] do not intend to return—they have nowhere else to go

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).