Skip to main content
· 12/14/1994

Woods v. City of Miami

Citations

  • 646 So. 2d 836
  • 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 12186
  • 1994 WL 697391

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that whether an employee's acts have been committed within scope of his employment or in furtherance of his employer's interest is generally a question for the jury when there are varying inferences and conclusions that may be drawn
  • ‘Whether an employee’s act was committed within the scope of his employment or in furtherance of the employer’s interest generally presents a question for the jury when there are varying inferences and conclusions to be drawn.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schwartz, C.J., and Hubbart and Green

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.