Woods v. Cessna Aircraft Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “These affidavits, while using the ‘magic’ words from Hanna v. CRA, Inc., supra, are devoid of a factual basis to adequately explain the trade or business of the Wallace Division of Cessna and its relation to Coonrod.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).