Woods v. Carol Management Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing \a public interest in allowing a company to receive business from a client even where an employee is bound by a non-solicitation covenant\
• recognizing “a public interest in allowing a company to receive business from a client even where an employee is bound by a non-solicitation covenant”
• stating that, where former employee had already consummated agreement with customer, \any future harm flowing from that contract can be quantified on the basis of the value of the contract and will be compensable in monetary damages\
• stating that, where former employee had already consummated agreement with customer, “any future harm flowing from that contract can be quantified on the basis of the value of the contract and will be compensable in monetary damages”
• “Absent an injunction, CTI stands to lose irretrievably aspects of its reputation and goodwill as well as the business of some of its most significant clients.”
• “Subject to the injunction, OnX stands only to lose the uncertain opportunity to benefit in the next year from business with new clients in the narrow pool of Harnett’s former accounts at CTI.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).