Woods v. Beaton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the government had not satisfied its burden of proof that the prime contractor had no responsibility for the losses incurred by the subcontractor
• awarding fourteen percent markup for overhead and a ten percent profit rate
• “[owner’s] refusal to grant an extension while keeping the original deadlines in place effectively constituted an order for constructive acceleration”
• “Constructive acceleration is recognized as a form of constructive change.”
• setting forth the requirements for constructive acceleration

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).