Woods v. Astrue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remanding case because the ALJ did not provide an explanation for disregarding some opinions given by a treating doctor whose opinion he gave “great weight”
• ALJ provided some weight to the treating doctor's opinion, but did not provide any reason for disregarding some of the limitations, requiring remand
• ALJ provided some weight to the treating doctor’s opinion, but did not provide any reason for disregarding some of the limitations, requiring remand
• remand was required when the ALJ provided weight to the treating physician’s opinion, but disregarded the physician’s limitations without explanation
• remand was required when the ALJ provided weight to the treating physician’s opinion, but disregarded the physician’s limitations without explanation
• remand was 2 The two limitations the ALJ discounted were: (1) the Plaintiff would be off task twenty percent of the day, and (2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).