Skip to main content
· 5/21/1999

Woodrum v. Thomas Memorial Hospital Foundation, Inc.

Citations

  • 186 F.R.D. 350
  • 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7753
  • 1999 WL 343631

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating the federal common law of privileges applies where the principal claim arises under federal law and there is pendent jurisdiction over a state claim
  • discussing the possibility that some communications during a meeting may be privileged while others are discoverable
  • finding “conversations among the board members discussing their attorney’s legal advice, and conversations among the board members and their attorney about potential litigation risk and legal strategy” attorney-client privileged
  • the “burden rests upon the objecting party to show why a particular discovery request is improper”
  • “The federal discovery rules are liberal in order to assist in trial preparation and settlement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Haden

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.