Woodrum v. Donovan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holdingthat Labor may treat classes of workers disparately where it has a rational basis for doing so
• sustaining Secretary of Labor’s interpretation of § 222(3) of the Trade Act of 1974 maintaining the phrase “articles produced” does not include the performance of services unrelated to the production of a tangible article
• “It is true ... that the remedial nature of the [TAA] statute requires a liberal construction.”
• “the Secretary has properly construed section 222(3) to exclude from its coverage workers for service firms not managed, owned, or controlled by a manufacturing firm producing the import-impacted [ ] article.”
• “On the basis of this definition, an independently owned and operated automobile dealership which is ‘not controlled or substantially or beneficially owned’ by a domestic car manufacturer is not part of the manufacturing firm ...’
• inspection and servicing of automobiles

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).