· 2/13/1989
Woodruff v. Shockey
Citations
- 297 Ark. 595
- 764 S.W.2d 431
- 1989 Ark. LEXIS 59
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[W]e are never at liberty to ignore or disregard a binding precedent of this Court.”
- “Aunanimous decision by a three-judge panel of this Court remains binding precedent until such time as it is modified or reversed by this Court enbanc or our Supreme Court”
- “A unanimous decision by a three-judge panel of this Court remains binding precedent until such time as it 15 The trial court’s award then cannot be sustained because it (1) did not receive evidence as to the actual costs and reasonableness of the fees and (2
- “Suffice it to say, we are never at liberty to ignore or disregard a binding precedent of this Court. A unanimous decision by a three-judge panel of this Court remains binding precedent until such time as it is modified or reversed by this Court en banc or our Supreme Court.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hays, Purtle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.