Skip to main content
· 2/13/1989

Woodruff v. Shockey

Citations

  • 297 Ark. 595
  • 764 S.W.2d 431
  • 1989 Ark. LEXIS 59

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[W]e are never at liberty to ignore or disregard a binding precedent of this Court.”
  • “Aunanimous decision by a three-judge panel of this Court remains binding precedent until such time as it is modified or reversed by this Court enbanc or our Supreme Court”
  • “A unanimous decision by a three-judge panel of this Court remains binding precedent until such time as it 15 The trial court’s award then cannot be sustained because it (1) did not receive evidence as to the actual costs and reasonableness of the fees and (2
  • “Suffice it to say, we are never at liberty to ignore or disregard a binding precedent of this Court. A unanimous decision by a three-judge panel of this Court remains binding precedent until such time as it is modified or reversed by this Court en banc or our Supreme Court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hays, Purtle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.