Woodruff v. Islandwide Carpentry Contrs., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remanding for development of justifications for exclusionary clause despite the fact that both parties had stipulated facts, because of unwillingness to formulate a potentially \far-reaching\ opinion
• remanding for development of justifications for exclusionary clause despite the fact that both parties had stipulated facts, because of unwillingness to formulate a potentially “far-reaching” opinion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).