Skip to main content
· 11/15/1850

Woodruff v. Columbus Insurance

Citations

  • 5 La. 697

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • plaintiff had not adequately alleged that the defendant failed to remit the collected tax to the state
  • “Discovery need not be granted to allow a plaintiff to engage in an unfounded fishing expedition for jurisdictional facts.”
  • dismissing for lack of subject matter jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Slidell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.