Woodruff v. Choate

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an order reserving the issue of attorney fees “was not a final judgment because it did not adjudicate all the pending claims”
• noting that an order reserving the issue of attorney fees under OCGA § 9-15-14 and OCGA § 19-9-3 was not a final judgment because it did not adjudicate all the pending claims
• noting that an order reserving the issue of attorney fees under OCGA § 9-15-14 and OCGA § 19-9-3 was not a final judgment because it did not adjudicate all the pending claims
• “Although the child’s election is presumptive, it is not conclusive and the trial court must still consider the child’s best interest.”
• order dismissing petition to modify child custody is subject to direct appeal
• Because the “petition was sufficient to state a claim, and the trial court considered evidence outside of the pleadings but did not permit [the petitioner] an opportunity to respond, 5 the trial court erred in dismissing [her] complaint.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).