Skip to main content
· 6/7/2016

Woodrow Hall v. Petra Spice

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the Civil No. 17-2331 and Criminal No. 14-225 (FAB) 16 following comment did not violate Rule 11: “And if you were to plead guilty today under these circumstances, I would give you the two points for acceptance [of responsibility].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.