Woodring v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that it is well settled that it is improper to elicit evidence regarding appellant’s assertion of his rights to counsel or to remain silent before the triers of fact
• relying upon United States v. Ward, 1 M.J. 176, 180 (C.M.A. 1975)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).