Woodmen of the World v. Walters

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that “merely attributing misrepresentation to a corporate 15 entity is inadequate; a specific person must be named, or at least identified”
• “merely attributing misrepresentation to a corporate entity is inadequate; a specific person must be named, or at least identified”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).