Woodmen of the World Life Insurance Society v. Etheridge

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• underscoring that a court may not strain the facts to extend coverage where none exists
• reminding courts that “an unambiguous policy requires no construction, and its plain terms must be given full effect even though they are beneficial to the insurer and detrimental to the insured”
• reminding courts that “an unambiguous policy requires no construction, and its plain terms must be given full effect even though they are beneficial to the insurer and detrimental to the insured”
• revg. s.c. 114 Ga. App. 807 (152 SE2d 773) (1966), which had overruled Maddox, supra

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).